Sam Alito shredded by analyst for 'placating man-baby' Trump in major Supreme Court case

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito drew sharp criticism from legal analyst Elie Mystal on Tuesday after suggesting the Supreme Court should invalidate Mississippi's mail-in ballot counting law because "losing candidates…would not accept" election results where late-arriving ballots changed the outcome.

Mystal, writing for The Nation, wasn't having it.

"I take issue with Alito’s framing, because it’s very clear that only one 'losing candidate' was such a sore loser as to not accept the clear results of the election...