BBC boss Tim Davie defended the corporation’s “difficult” decision not to sack Huw Edwards when it knew the police had arrested him over the most serious category of child abuse images.
But how can he possibly defend continuing to pay him?
ReutersBBC boss Tim Davie defended corporation’s decision to keep paying Huw Edwards[/caption] PAIt is wrong that Huw Edwards was given the equivalent of 1,194 licence fees[/caption]Maybe if the BBC had taken The Sun’s story from July last year a little bit more seriously...