Former President Trump has argued prosecutors at his recent hush money trial introduced evidence that is protected under the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, an assertion that could upend his conviction.
Trump does not assert immunity from the 34 guilty counts themselves, but he argues the verdict must be set aside because certain pieces of evidence were protected "official acts" that should never have been shown to the jury.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's (D) office is pushing back...